Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sutter Health presents plan for 325‑bed hospital and campus in Emeryville; council sends project to environmental review
Summary
Sutter Health previewed a concept for a 15‑story, 785,000‑sq‑ft hospital campus in Emeryville with up to 325 beds, a rooftop helipad and more than $1 billion in private investment. Council directed staff to pursue an EIR, fiscal analysis and general‑plan consistency review and to return with community‑benefit options.
Sutter Health told the Emeryville City Council on July 27 that it is proposing a new medical campus on the Chiron PUD site that would include a 15‑story, roughly 785,000‑square‑foot hospital building with capacity for up to 325 beds, a rooftop helipad and reuse of several existing buildings for medical offices and support services. "We are proposing a more than $1,000,000,000 investment to expand comprehensive health care here in the region," said Trevor Brand, chief executive officer with Sutter’s Alta Bates Summit Medical Center.
City planning staff and the applicant said the project is in an early, conceptual stage and will require a PUD amendment, a general‑plan amendment and certification of an environmental impact report under CEQA before any entitlements. Planning Manager Miru Desai told the council the Notice of Preparation for the EIR will be issued next month, a scoping meeting is scheduled for Aug. 27, and the draft EIR will be circulated for public comment following the consultant's analyses. "This is the city of Emeryville’s planning and review process, and our role here is to share information, be able to answer any questions and, most importantly, to listen," Brand added.
Sutter’s presentation included preliminary program and massing, open‑space concepts and potential workforce housing on a separate site (B‑1). The applicant estimated the project could create nearly 3,000 permanent jobs and several hundred construction jobs at peak, and described an all‑electric building and other sustainability features. Staff emphasized that many technical issues remain: the project as presented would trigger CEQA review, height and zoning amendments, and transportation and fiscal studies. The council did not take action on entitlements; instead members asked staff to return with a comprehensive general‑plan consistency analysis, a fiscal sustainability evaluation, a safe‑routes/complete‑streets assessment and reasonable alternatives the council could consider during entitlements.
