Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Industrial Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board debate revives earlier industrial-land-use wording amid small-business concerns
Summary
A board member moved to reopen a prior recommendation to permit residential as a supporting use in industrial-designation areas; proponents argued the change threatens Boulder’s small industrial culture, opponents said allowing limited residential reuse supports livability and prevents large dead zones.
Get email alerts on the Industrial Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board member Emil (planning board) proposed reviving a previously approved planning-board recommendation that would allow residential uses as a supporting use in the industrial future-land-use designation. Emil argued the change “is in direct conflict with at least six BVCP policies” and would threaten long-standing small industrial enterprises and culturally important employment spaces.
Opponents, including Mark, said many of the small industrial and maker businesses the board seeks to preserve are located in other designations (innovation zones) and that permitting limited residential uses as secondary options could prevent large swaths of underutilized property from becoming dead zones. After spirited debate, the board used a straw poll to add consideration of the industrial-land-use wording back onto the list of items to deliberate; subsequent motions and votes on related agenda items proceeded later in the evening.
The exchange highlighted a recurring tension in the BVCP update: how to balance preservation of small, affordable industrial spaces with city goals for housing and compact, mixed-use neighborhoods.

