Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Whitetail Bend Subdivision topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents press stormwater, density concerns as Piqua considers Whitetail Bend final plat

Piqua City Commission · July 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff and the developer described a final‑plat approval for Whitetail Bend Sections 1–2 (about 75 lots, a large retention pond and HOA open space), while many nearby residents said soil saturation, agricultural tile systems, and downstream ponds mean the plan’s stormwater routing is inadequate and urged the commission to preserve planning‑commission conditions.

City staff and the developer asked the commission to approve the final plat and development plan for Whitetail Bend Section 1 and 2, saying the final engineering meets subdivision and stormwater standards laid out in the preliminary plat. Planning staff and the city’s contracted PE said the site’s stormwater retention pond and SWIP plan meet the required standards and that water would be released at designed rates into existing storm infrastructure. “This pond is engineered beyond the required EPA standards,” said Rob Smith of D.R. Horton, who asked the commission to treat the vote as the final plat stage, distinct from zoning decisions made at preliminary approval.

Dozens of residents and landowners from Eagles Lake, Deerfield and surrounding rural parcels urged the commission to delay approval or require more conditions. Speakers described standing water on private fields, alleged agricultural tile systems flowing onto the site, concerns about soil‑sample availability and the effect of a concentrated 70‑plus home development on downstream basins and basements. “Water runs to the lowest spot … there is nowhere for the water to go,” said Valerie Mulligan, who asked the commission not to push the project forward without stronger protections. Commissioners asked staff to explain why many planning‑commission stipulations were not carried into the final‑plat recommendation and discussed adding residents’ photos and documentation into the record prior to a final vote.