Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Algorithmic Bias topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Candidates Call to Limit Surveillance Tech and Require Human Oversight of AI in Hiring and Policing
Summary
Forum candidates urged bans or limits on flock cameras and called for human review of AI decisions in hiring, housing and policing to prevent built‑in bias, with calls for transparency from companies about model training.
Candidates at the Reconnect Malden forum raised algorithmic bias as a cross‑cutting concern in employment, housing and policing and recommended legal limits and transparency requirements for vendors.
Ryan O’Malley suggested prohibitions on certain automated uses that can filter out job applicants and the need to “maintain a human ... mechanical switch” so AI systems do not make consequential decisions alone. Carrie McDonald and Jay Higgins urged banning or strict rules on so‑called flock cameras or other surveillance systems and called for clearer limits on data sharing and retention. Kate Lippert Garabedian described research showing bias reintroduced by AI systems and said human review often improves outcomes.
Speakers recommended transparency about how models are trained, public access to testing results, and statutory limits where AI could affect freedom or benefit decisions, such as in criminal-justice or health-care settings. The forum recorded concerns and legislative goals but no enacted regulatory language.
