Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission refers KU Endowment annexation petition to planning commission after flood, soil and services concerns
Summary
After residents raised flooding and prime-soils concerns and township officials asked to be included, the Lawrence City Commission voted 4–0 to refer a KU Endowment annexation application to the Planning Commission for study and recommendation; referral does not approve future rezoning or development.
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lawrence City Commission voted unanimously to refer a KU Endowment annexation petition to the Lawrence–Douglas County Planning Commission for study and public hearings.
Mayor Brad Finkel clarified the vote was only to accept the application and send it to staff and the Planning Commission, not to approve annexation or future zoning. Interim airport manager Melissa Sevan told the commission the annexation would not alter filings already submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration but would identify the property as a potential future development area for the airport. "It does not change or affect what’s been submitted," Sevan said.
Residents from Grant Township told commissioners the parcel sits in a flood-prone area with high-quality soils and includes a well that is a source point for Jefferson County Rural Water District 13. Nancy Thelman described the site’s flooding after a heavy April rain and urged caution. "The soil wasn't saturated... much of Grant Township was underwater," she said. Paulette Schwart, a Grant Township trustee, asked to be included in notifications because the township provides road maintenance and other services for the land.
Supporters of studying the property, including Steve Kelly of the Chamber/EDC, asked the commission to move the petition forward to identify issues and possible mitigations. Farmer and business owner Scott Feldman urged returning the application to the applicant, arguing the parcel lies in a tier-3 growth area and is remote from municipal water; he said annexation should follow infrastructure rather than precede it. Commissioners responded that referral would enable the necessary studies and public input. The motion to refer the application (A26‑004) and notify utility providers passed 4–0.

