Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Discipline And Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board issues multiple discipline decisions and approves settlements after executive session

State of Oregon Board of Accountancy · December 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After an executive session, the Board of Accountancy returned to public session and recorded roll-call votes on a series of enforcement decisions (a mix of sufficient and insufficient evidence findings across case dockets) and approved settlement proposals including penalties and costs. Motions were moved by Jason Robinson and seconded by Megan Hartley.

After adjourning to executive session under ORS exemptions, the board returned to public session and moved through a slate of disciplinary matters. Jason Robinson made successive motions to find sufficient or insufficient evidence in multiple cases; each motion was seconded (frequently by Megan Hartley) and passed by roll call.

Examples recorded in open session include motions on case 25-006 (insufficient evidence for OAR 801.010.0010 pen 1 pen B); case 25-007 (both insufficient and sufficient evidence motions across different allegations within the docket); and additional cases (25-008 through 25-016) with roll-call votes recorded as passing. The board also voted to close an older 2019 report (2019-RPT-046) and moved to close several miscellaneous inquiries.

The board approved settlement proposals for grouped Duke Care cases, including proposed penalties and costs with some amounts stayed and net payable figures noted; a motion to approve the settlements passed by roll call. In each of the public votes, members recorded aye votes during roll-call and the chair announced motions as passing. Board staff said subsequent enforcement steps would follow the public record and the relevant case files.