Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Discipline Case 25 006 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board of Accountancy Complaints Committee finds sufficient evidence in case 25-006
Summary
After reconvening from executive session, the committee voted 5-0 to find sufficient evidence of one or more violations in disciplinary case 25-006; three members were absent. The motion was made by Brad Bingenheimer and seconded by Greg Rogers.
The Board of Accountancy Complaints Committee reconvened public session at 10:56 a.m. on Nov. 6, 2025, and moved to consider recommendations from executive session. Brad Bingenheimer moved “that there is sufficient evidence that there is 1 or more violation of board rules and or statutes” in case number 25-006; Greg Rogers seconded the motion.
The committee conducted a roll-call vote with five members voting yes and no recorded nays or abstentions. Chair Sean Wallace stated the motion carried. Members Michael Mead, Scott Wright and Susie Gillespie were noted absent for the vote. The record (roll call) shows the five present voting yes: Brad Bingenheimer, Bryce Wilburger, Greg Rogers, Norm Rush and Sean Wallace.
No additional discussion or next-step directives were recorded in public session following the vote. The committee moved on to consider other matters from executive session.
