Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press planning commission on affordability, septic feasibility and scenic protections
Summary
Public comments at the Braintree hearing focused on preserving scenic character, the high acreage requirements in rural districts, affordability concerns, and whether draft rules sufficiently reflect earlier January forum comments; commissioners promised to publish a spreadsheet linking prior comments to draft responses.
At the public hearing on the draft zoning bylaws residents raised recurring themes: preserve scenic rural character, explain how comments from the January forum were incorporated, and address affordability and technical feasibility of proposed lot sizes and standards.
Several speakers urged that the town's scenic and rural-district protections be clear and that the development review board have objective standards to guide sometimes subjective determinations about scenic character. "We cherish certain things in the town plan," one commissioner said during the deliberation on scenic-resource wording; a subsequent motion removed a district-specific reference so scenic criteria would apply more generally to conditional-use reviews.
Residents also pressed the commission to show how prior public-forum comments were cataloged and addressed; staff said they had created a spreadsheet mapping comments to bylaw sections and agreed to publish it. The planning commission emphasized that the draft is not final, that comments will be considered and that specific edits will be debated at future meetings including the Oct. 2 special meeting.
