Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Overview topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Braintree planning commission closes public hearing on draft zoning bylaws after wide-ranging comments
Summary
The Planning Commission closed its public hearing on proposed zoning bylaws after hours of public comment on lot sizes, ADUs, flood rules and waiver authority; commissioners voted to take comments under advisement and scheduled a special meeting Oct. 2 to act on edits.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Overview topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Braintree Planning Commission closed its public hearing on a comprehensive rewrite of the town's zoning bylaws after hearing public comments about lot sizes, housing conversions, flood regulations and waiver authority.
Chair Nathan Cleveland opened the hearing and asked speakers to limit remarks; consultant Kyle Patz of the 2 Rivers Ottokichi Regional Commission summarized major changes in the draft, including updated accessory dwelling unit (ADU) language, an adaptive-reuse provision, a housing-conversion pathway to add units with reduced review burden, and a new neighborhood residential district intended to enable smaller lots near South Braintree. "This is about simplifying the bylaws and facilitating housing," Patz said in his overview.
Residents and commissioners then spent most of the evening debating substantive points: whether the draft's proposed 0.5-acre village lot standard is feasible given on-site well and septic constraints, whether two rural districts with similar rules unnecessarily limit development, and whether the town should apply a state-style "flood corridor" (the transcript referenced a "0.25" corridor standard) in local law.
After public comment, a motion to close the hearing was moved from the floor and seconded; the commission voted 3โ1 to close public comment for this session while preserving the commission's ability to make additional changes before any select board review. Chair Cleveland said the commission will compile comments and deliberations for follow-up and that the select board will have its required hearing should the commission transmit the draft.
The commission also scheduled a special meeting for Oct. 2 to continue reviewing public comments and proposed edits. The chair said the revision process is iterative and that the draft remains a working document subject to further change before any transmittal to the select board.

