Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campers RVs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates RV and camper exemptions in zoning draft, seeks clearer language
Summary
Selectboard members and planning‑commission representatives debated two exemption clauses that address RVs and campers (both reference a 180‑day limit). Members agreed the provisions largely overlap and discussed clarifying occupancy versus registration and how tents or yurts should be treated.
During the Oct. 15 planning meeting, board members focused on two exemption provisions in the draft zoning bylaw (items 7 and 13) that govern RVs, camper trailers and temporary habitation.
Chair asked planning commission representatives to explain differences between the two clauses; a planning commission participant said the items are largely redundant and suggested removing one. The chair described a distinction in intent: item 13 appears to address temporary habitation and requires compliance with setbacks, while item 7 reads more like allowances for stored or unoccupied vehicles. The chair urged clarifying language so residents who own and occasionally use an RV do not unintentionally violate the bylaw.
Participants also discussed registration versus licensing: the chair proposed replacing 'license' with 'registered' to signal that a current motor vehicle registration—rather than a separate permit—was the intended test of lawful, mobile status. The group noted the draft must also address tents, yurts and other non‑vehicle temporary structures, because those are not registered and require separate treatment.
