Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Software topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Staff recommends Civic Plus recreation software after multi‑vendor review

City of Mission — Committee meetings (Community Development; Finance & Administration) · May 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Parks staff recommended a three‑year contract with Civic Plus to replace MyRec, citing better reporting, mobile capability and integration; Year 1 implementation is $32,685 (to be funded from capital improvement or sales tax), with recurring Year 2 and 3 fees estimated at $21,000 and $22,155 respectively.

Parks staff recommended the city contract with Civic Plus for parks and recreation management software following a competitive review of eight providers. Brian/presentation staff said the recommended vendor scored highest across reliability, KPI reporting, integration with the city’s financial software, and a mobile patron experience. “It's a more robust system,” Pan Alimony said, adding that Civic Plus offers a web and mobile application suite staff expects to use for registrations, facility booking, CRM, and reporting.

Staff outlined the anticipated costs: a Year 1 implementation package at $32,685 to cover onboarding and one‑on‑one support, a recurring Year 2 fee of about $21,000, and a projected Year 3 increase to $22,155 (a 5% increase). Staff told the committee Year 1 funds would come from the capital improvement project fund or sales tax proceeds and noted a $70,000 capital fund savings from deferred work that reduces immediate budget pressure. Multiple council members asked whether vendor data imports are reliable and whether the product had been user‑tested; Pan Alimony acknowledged imports are rarely perfect but said peer cities reported a smooth transfer and that CRM functions are included in the purchase.

Committee members pressed for a written comparison of how Civic Plus outperformed lower‑cost bids. Councilmember Ben requested clearer documentation showing where the higher bid yielded operational savings or avoided staff time; staff agreed to include those details in the regular agenda packet. The committee directed staff to move the contract recommendation to the regular agenda for final action.