Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Flood Response topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents say bridges and new development worsened July floods, urge county debris help

Uvalde County Commissioners Court · July 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Several Uvalde County residents told commissioners their homes and vehicles were lost in the July flood, said low-water bridges stranded families and asked the county to provide dumpsters or haul debris rather than charging homeowners.

Angela Turner, a Deer Valley resident, told the court that floodwaters entered her home four separate times and that her family “lost everything, everything in the flood, down to RVs, cars, our home, our belongings, animals.” She said bridges and low-water crossings installed recently blocked exits and left people stranded: “People were stranded, could not get out.”

Becky Reinhardt, who identified herself as a school head at St. Phillips, described five feet of water in her house, rotten food and dead animals creating a strong stench. “We needed to have a way to get rid of the debris,” she said, adding that volunteer neighbors and churches have been the primary source of help while county assistance was slow or bureaucratic. Multiple speakers asked the court for county-arranged dumpsters or free debris pickup for unincorporated residents rather than asking families to haul or pay for removal.

Other public commenters including Cara Sanchez and Dina Aguirre urged permanent road maintenance, emergency contingency planning and an independent review of a nearby Rio Seco subdivision that residents say may have redirected runoff into the older Studer Park neighborhood. Dina Aguirre formally requested that the county review engineering, drainage design and approval processes for Rio Seco to determine whether grading or mitigation measures might have increased flood risk.

The court took no direct emergency cleanup action during public comment but the concerns framed later agenda debates on debris staging, landfill permits and contracts for debris removal.