Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Watertown board hears mixed results in year‑2 strategic plan; math, reading show dips

Watertown Unified School District Board of Education · July 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Administrators presented year‑two strategic plan data showing math proficiency at a tentative 45% (goal 50%) and 3rd‑grade reading down to 48% (goal 53%). The board asked for finalized state data in September and for building‑level action plans.

The Watertown Unified School District board on July 27 reviewed year‑two strategic plan outcomes, with administrators flagging declines in key student achievement measures and proposing continued focus on instructional strategies.

Chris Malloy, who led the presentation, said the district tracks 8th‑grade math proficiency as a core indicator. “Our goal for this year was to have 50 percent of the students meet proficiency,” Malloy said, noting that preliminary (tentative) data put 8th‑grade math at 45 percent and that the state will finalize results in the fall. He added the district expects only small adjustments after GLM validations are integrated. On literacy, Malloy said, “We were at 51% the last couple years, and this year tentatively we’re at 48%,” and maintained the recommendation to keep the 3rd‑grade reading goal at 53%.

Board members pressed for clarity about curriculum evaluation and timelines. A board member asked when a curriculum should be judged a “red flag”; Malloy recommended awaiting finalized state scores in September and examining three years of implementation data before making wholesale changes. The board directed administration to provide finalized state comparisons and curriculum evaluation documents at the next relevant committee meeting.

Why it matters: math and reading proficiency are central indicators for district accountability and operational planning; the board requested building‑level action plans and further data to determine whether interventions, curriculum changes or other actions are warranted.