Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Driveway topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Zoning board sustains appeal, finds evidence of historic driveway at Collection at Barney

Newport Zoning Board of Review · July 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Newport Zoning Board of Review unanimously sustained an appeal from Collection at Barney LLC, concluding the property’s cobblestone apron and other evidence supported a historic, nonconforming driveway and removing the zoning officer’s requirement that the owners seek variances before restoring the driveway.

The Newport Zoning Board of Review voted unanimously July 27 to sustain an appeal from the Collection at Barney LLC, finding sufficient evidence that a cobblestone‑surfaced opening between buildings at 18 Barney Street was historically used as a driveway.

Appellants’ counsel Jay Russell Jackson presented photographic and aerial evidence and called EJ Lanney, who testified that excavation revealed a brick and cobblestone base, a curb cut and an apron that “was essentially paved with old bricks and cobblestones” and that city paving crews had left the historic gutter in place. Lanney said the refurbished apron now accommodates two vehicle spaces and that the work restored what he described as an existing, historic driveway. "There was a cobblestone gutter that had been, in existence prior," Lanney testified.

Zoning staff told the board they could find no formal engineering record of a curb cut, but acknowledged visual and aerial evidence in the record. Vice Chairman Dave Riley moved to sustain the appeal, a motion the board adopted after members said they found the witness testimony and site evidence persuasive. The board instructed counsel to prepare the written decision; Mr. Jackson agreed to draft it. The vote recorded a unanimous 5‑0 decision to sustain the appeal, overturning the zoning officer’s prior determination.

The ruling means the applicants may proceed with restoring the aproned area as a driveway subject to any permitting requirements the engineering department may impose; the board did not adopt a separate variance at this meeting. The decision resolves a longstanding dispute over whether the area functions as a historic driveway or an impermissible new curb cut requiring variances.