Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission cautioned on limits of local regulation as comp plan and state law factor into annexation
Summary
Staff briefed commissioners on the 2019 comprehensive plan, zoning implications of annexation to B‑1 and state legal limits (Public Act 104‑0458) on municipal authority to ban or unreasonably restrict solar, noting municipalities retain authority to adopt reasonable regulations.
Commission staff reminded the panel that the city’s 2019 comprehensive plan is a policy guide, not a zoning code, and noted parts of the parcels are shown as single‑family or multifamily in the future‑land‑use map. Commissioners were urged to point to comp‑plan conflicts if they believe annexation is inconsistent with that policy guidance.
Staff also explained the state’s recent public act (referred to in testimony as Public Act 104‑0458) which took effect June 1 and constrains municipal ability to prohibit or effectively prohibit solar installations. "We can retain our authority to adopt and enforce reasonable zoning regulations, but those regulations cannot be used to completely ban or unreasonably restrict solar energy systems," staff said. That places limits on what local rules can accomplish and means site‑specific screening, setbacks and decommissioning plans are the principal tools available in the local review process.
The commission noted the tension between future land‑use aspirations in the comp plan and the property owner’s right to propose annexation; staff reiterated that the commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to city council, which will conduct the ordinance readings and public hearing required by state statute.
