Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accounting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board member explains why government accounting can obscure cash availability
Summary
A board member described the difference between FASB/GAAP and GASB rules, explained that Idaho uses modified GAAP with a 13-month revenue accrual, and warned accruals can make a district's statements look like it has more cash than it does.
A school board member spent part of his remarks explaining accounting frameworks that govern public-school finances, contrasting private-sector FASB/GAAP rules with the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) rules that apply to government entities. "There are two kinds of accounting," he said, and noted GASB uses accrual accounting more extensively in ways that differ from corporate practice.
He pointed out that the state's modified GAAP approach includes a revenue accrual covering one school year plus one month (13 months). "When you read these numbers, it looks like the district has a ton of money. No. We have a ton of accruals, but we don't have the money yet," he said, urging the board to interpret audited statements with that timing in mind.
The member recommended the board prioritize financial management—acting on forecasts and cash flows—rather than relying solely on historical accounting statements to make near-term budget decisions. He said this shift would help the district avoid avoidable shortfalls and improve transparency for taxpayers.
