Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance Bonding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenter: Equalization boost could raise Frankfort’s bonding potential to about $24M
Summary
A presenter told the Frankfort Independent board that state budget equalization pushed building-fund revenue higher, estimating local bonding capacity near $21.8 million and a combined potential around $24 million when state grants are included.
Mr. George, the presenter at the July 27 board meeting, told trustees the district’s building-fund revenue is projected to rise substantially under changes in the state budget’s equalization formula. "Last fiscal year, your all total debt service payments were just above 700,000," he said, and showed the district’s debt service remains near that level while building-fund revenue jumps.
Mr. George outlined the mechanics driving the increase: equalization per "nickel" rose in the recent state budget (he cited an increase in the illustrative example from about $285,000 to $325,000), and temporary equalization language in the budget will flow to the district for a limited period. He said the analysis estimates building-fund revenue rising from about $1.5 million in FY26 to roughly $2.0 million in FY27, and to about $2.2 million once full equalization on the latest nickel phases in.
Using those revenue projections, Mr. George modeled bonding capacity and reported a local bonding potential of about $21.8 million. He added roughly $400,000 in SFCC offers of assistance and $2 million tied to House Bill 900 to reach an aggregate potential just over $24 million. He cautioned the board about timing: certain favorable provisions in the budget (identified in the presentation as carrying sunset dates) will change after 06/30/2027 and could affect the district’s options for funding projects without additional state review.
Board members pressed Mr. George on interest-rate assumptions. He said the report used a conservative debt-service rate assumption in the mid-4% range for 20–25 year maturities, noting recent 20-year deals around the low 4s and 25-year pricing in the 4.25–4.40% range. He offered to answer follow-up questions after the meeting and left the report materials with the board.
The board did not take formal action on the bonding analysis at the meeting; Mr. George recommended the district consider timing potential projects to take advantage of the current equalization window and the June 30, 2027 administrative deadlines.
