Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Riddle SD 70 discusses seismic grant for annex roof and outlines bond planning

Riddle SD 70 Board of Education · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent Russell briefed the board on eligibility for a seismic grant to replace the high-school annex roof and possible asbestos abatement; the facilities committee also sketched a bond-levy timeline that could generate roughly $4.5 million at an example rate, paired with state match to reach about $9 million.

Superintendent Russell told the board the district is eligible to apply for an additional seismic grant that could help replace the high-school annex roof and address crumbling flooring. "It's a it needs a roof," Russell said, adding the current estimate for a project could be in the neighborhood of $2.5 million if the scope includes floor work and asbestos removal.

Facilities committee members described a phased plan to repair the grandstand in sections and to solicit donations for lumber. Russell presented a site plan and a budget breakdown for the annex project: about $1,400,000 total in the packet example, with roughly $1,100,000 for construction costs and about $300,000 for project management by TPL consultants. The district has scheduled contractor walk-throughs and bids are due in coming weeks.

Board members also discussed long-range bond planning to support multiple projects. Russell described a hypothetical 15-year bond levy at $0.85 per $1,000 that, combined with a state matching grant, could yield about $9 million for facility work. "If you start in late summer and work up to a full-court door-to-door effort in March and April, you can build support," Russell said, outlining outreach strategies used in other districts. The board did not commit to a bond measure at the meeting; members were asked to consider timelines and community messaging before any formal decision.