Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Developer Conflict topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident criticizes development decisions, alleges preferential treatment and warns against taxpayer bailouts
Summary
Mark Davis of East Black Crater Avenue urged the commission to act as a watchdog, alleging preferential treatment for developer Bradley Tisdale, past planning failures, and objecting to a proposed $10,000,000 pavilion he said would amount to bailing out a developer.
Mark Davis, who identified his address as 33 East Black Crater Avenue, spoke during visitor communications and sharply criticized recent development decisions and proposed public spending.
"It seems to be the city is trying to bail out this developer by spending $10,000,000 in taxpayer money to put up this pavilion building that frankly nobody wants and the city can't afford it," Davis said, and urged commissioners to remember they are citizens first and to act as a watchdog between staff, council and developers.
Davis recounted prior cases—he referenced a space-age gas station review and a nine-lot subdivision he said received preferential treatment for Bradley Tisdale—and said staff had tried to avoid planning commission review on some projects. He also cited public opposition to a cold-weather shelter as an example of projects that touched off strong citizen response.
The comment period record shows Davis' concerns and specific allegations; the commission did not take formal action in response during the session.
