Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cherokee County votes to object to Holly Springs annexation proposal for Lower Union Hill Road
Summary
After staff and county attorney presentations, the County Commission directed the county attorney to assert a formal objection to the City of Holly Springs’ proposed annexation of 301 Lower Union Hill Road, citing growth-boundary agreement conflicts, increased density and material fiscal/infrastructure burdens.
Cherokee County commissioners voted to direct the county attorney to assert an objection to the proposed City of Holly Springs annexation of 301 Lower Union Hill Road.
Planning staff (Ms. Long) outlined reasons for concern, including that the proposed annexation lies outside the county’s growth boundary agreement and that the project's proposed zoning (mixed-use with 92 townhomes and roughly 60,000 square feet of commercial space) represented a substantial change to allowable density and use that could impose increased infrastructure and fiscal burdens on the county. "The proposed project is outside of the growth boundary agreement," staff said during the presentation.
The county attorney summarized potential legal grounds to object under Georgia's annexation dispute resolution procedures, noting impacts to county resources and a material increase in infrastructure costs (reduced impact fee revenue, increased road and parks maintenance costs). The board moved to direct the county attorney to assert an objection consistent with that analysis; the motion passed on an affirmative vote.
The board’s action begins the statutory process to formally contest the annexation before the City of Holly Springs makes a final decision; city hearings were noted on the record and the county’s objection will be part of the statutory review/negotiation process.
