Council approves plain‑language juror oaths and directs staff to draft legislation

The Judicial Council approved a proposal from the Judicial Administration and Management Subcommittee to replace archaic juror oath wording with plain‑language alternatives for prospective juror voir dire and for jurors seated to decide a trial.

Daryl Parker, chair of the Judicial Administration and Management Subcommittee, explained that the current oath language (governed by California Code of Civil Procedure section 232) is outdated and can be difficult for jurors to understand. Parker read the existing language and the proposed simpler alternatives, noting the change aligns with the branch's goals on access, fairness and public understanding: "Do you understand and agree, under the penalty of perjury, that you will accurately and truthfully answer all questions about your qualifications and ability to serve as a juror in this case..." was offered as the simplified alternative.

The council voted to approve the proposal and directed staff to prepare a draft bill for the legislation committee; an abstention was recorded during the voice vote. Presenters said the change aims to improve juror comprehension and align oaths with other plain‑language materials on jury service.