Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rule 10 440 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Judicial Council adopts Rule 10.440 to track civil arrests in court facilities
Summary
The Council adopted Proposed Rule 10.440, directing trial courts to report known information about civil arrests in court facilities (location, agency, custody status, warrant presence) via a standardized web form beginning in June; the rule aims to collect data, not to regulate law enforcement.
Presiding Judge Patricia Kelly introduced Proposed Rule 10.440, describing it as a "uniform statewide framework for reporting civil arrests that occur in California trial court facilities." Sharif Al Malla described incidents at the Oroville Courthouse and said courts currently lack consistent statewide data about civil arrests; Judge Scott Young emphasized that the rule is intended to collect data that courts become aware of rather than to require courts to investigate law enforcement actions.
The rule defines a civil arrest to include situations in which officers communicate intent to arrest even if no custody follows, covers court facility interiors, parking lots and grounds, and asks courts to report specified fields if known—agency, location, custody status, and whether a warrant was presented. Judge Young characterized the proposal as "a carefully calibrated approach" intended to enable statewide analysis while keeping reporting feasible for courts. The Council moved and adopted the rule, which presenters said would take effect May 1 with reporting to begin in June via a Judicial Council web form.
