Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident questions borrowing plan; staff defends OWRB financing over pay-as-you-go
Summary
A resident asked whether the authority should borrow for infrastructure or pay as it collects utility revenue; staff explained that large projects and inflation make low-interest OWRB loans more cost-effective and described draw-down mechanics to limit interest exposure.
During discussion of Resolution 16-64, a resident asked whether borrowing large sums was effectively prepaying expenses and whether the city could instead fund projects as it collected rate revenue.
"Is it just prepaying all your expenses or what?" the resident asked. Staff answered that the authority follows a multi-year capital plan and that projects often total $20 million–$30 million; paying entirely by cash collected through rate increases would both delay projects and increase overall cost because construction prices rise over time.
Staff said OWRB loans typically offer lower interest rates to municipalities and that the loan structure allows the authority to draw funds as projects proceed, meaning interest accrues only on amounts drawn rather than on the full authorized ceiling. "As you draw down off of the authorized amount, that's when you start making the start making payments," staff said.
Board members indicated support for repairing water and sewer infrastructure but asked staff to provide project-level attachments and breakdowns, which are included in the meeting materials online according to staff.
