Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Code Amendment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission backs code changes to allow roof signs in CBD and define farmers’ markets; Walker votes no

Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission · May 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission recommended approval of ZCA-36 to permit roof signs in the CBD sign budget and to add a definition and allowances for farmers’ markets on private property; vote 8-1 with Chair Walker dissenting after neighbor testimony.

The Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission voted 8-1 on May 7, 2025, to recommend zoning code amendments (ZCA-36) that would allow roof signs within the Central Business District sign budget and add definitions and allowances for farmers’ markets on private property.

Staff explained the rooftop sign change would remove the narrow earlier restriction that limited roof signs to a small "Downtown Entertainment District" and instead allow roof signs as part of the CBD sign budget; staff said approved roof signs must be static and non‑scrolling. The farmers’ markets amendment defines farmers’ markets in code, clarifies they are generally temporary and often use tents and stalls, and provides allowances for markets on private property while preserving the existing special‑event and street‑closure permitting process.

A nearby resident, Sally Hughes, opposed expanding rooftop signage, arguing it could harm the character of historic Art Deco buildings: she warned other U.S. cities later struggled to reverse rooftop sign approvals. "The beautiful Art Deco buildings are an asset to the community and this would change their look," Hughes said. Commissioners discussed prior Board of Adjustment decisions approving individual rooftop signs and whether codifying the change was appropriate.

The commission recommended approval of ZCA-36, motion by Craddock, seconded by Whitlock; the vote was 8 in favor and 1 opposed (Walker). The amendment proceeds to City Council for its consideration.