Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Technology topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Expert testimony outlines counter-drone options and costs for prisons

House Judiciary and Rules Committee · January 29, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A private-sector counter-UAS expert told the committee there is no silver bullet: detection can involve radar, passive RF, and cameras; defeat options include jamming, cyber defeat, nets, or kinetic means. Costs vary by system and site, with passive detection and cyber-defeat systems estimated between roughly $100,000 and $500,000.

Dirk Manley, president of Boundary Creek Partners (a counter-UAS firm), told the committee that protecting facilities from drones requires a layered approach: "You need a layered approach. Typically... detect, track, identify, and defeat." He described detection via radar and passive RF (listening for controller-to-drone protocols), automated camera cueing (EO/IR), and the ability to locate operators.

Manley said defeat options include jamming Wi-Fi or GPS signals so the aircraft lands or returns home, cyber-defeat that can seize or direct the drone without wide-area jamming, and kinetic or capture systems (nets, confetti-wrapping projectiles) when necessary. On cost he said passive detection systems can be "fairly inexpensive" but that solutions range "from $100,000 to close to $500,000" depending on capability and site layout. He warned that adversaries can program home locations and that swarming or high-capacity payloads complicate defenses.