Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Telecommunications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planners weigh Internet access and cell coverage against scenic preservation
Summary
Commissioners recommended the plan explicitly address Internet access and telecommunications for residents, visitors and safety along Route 108 and Route 36, while also identifying scenic viewsheds where siting of towers, wind turbines, or large solar arrays should be considered carefully.
Commissioners told the planning commission that reliable Internet and telecommunications are priorities for residents and small businesses and that coverage gaps along primary approaches (Route 108 and Route 36) pose safety and connectivity concerns. One commissioner said broadband and cellular access should be framed in the plan as supporting both residents and visitors and also public safety.
The presenter said energy and an enhanced energy plan will be handled using the NRPC template, which will be enforceable where incorporated, and suggested telecommunications goals be included in that work where appropriate. Commissioners also debated how to balance infrastructure needs with preserving scenic views: several participants recommended identifying specific viewsheds (for example, approaches from East Fairfield and ridge lines to the east) and drafting siting policies that take scenic resources into account rather than blanket prohibitions. "In these viewsheds, take scenic resources into account in the siting of things," the Agency official said, recommending that view protection be made specific in the land‑use policy so enforcement is clear.
Commissioners asked staff to identify options — both technical (antenna siting, fiber) and policy (viewshed identification, siting criteria) — so the plan can support improved connectivity while protecting the rural character residents value.
