Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Religious Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator Foreman’s Constitutional Courts Act sent to print after committee debate
Summary
Senator Dan Foreman presented RS32880C1 to bar enforcement of arbitration or judgments based on religious or cultural laws that conflict with the U.S. or Idaho constitutions; the committee voted to send the proposal to print after members raised constitutional questions.
Senator Dan Foreman introduced RS32880C1, the Constitutional Courts Act, telling the committee the draft would add a section to Idaho code to prohibit state courts from enforcing or applying judgments, decrees or arbitration awards grounded in a body of religious or cultural law that does not conform to the U.S. Constitution and the Idaho Constitution. Foreman said the bill is not intended to ban private religious practice but to prevent court enforcement of parallel legal systems.
Committee members requested clarification about practical effects and constitutional alignment. Senator Ruckdy raised concerns the bill could run against state and federal protections for religious liberty; Foreman responded that the bill is intended to reinforce constitutional protections by preventing courts from elevating one group's religious rules over others. After discussion, Senator Lenny moved to send RS32880C1 to print, Senator Keiser seconded, the committee answered 'aye' by voice, and the motion carried.
