Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs Trane HVAC replacements, remote BAS support and multi‑year service costs for county jail
Summary
County staff presented Trane proposals to replace jail HVAC units and two service packages: a biannual maintenance plan (~$21,000/year) and a higher‑cost BAS remote‑monitoring package offering 24/7 VAS support and 96 banked field hours. Commissioners asked staff to negotiate start dates and pricing before a final contract is brought to the board.
Get email alerts on the Facilities Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County facilities staff summarized two Trane proposals and the commission discussed whether to contract out maintenance or rely on in‑house staff. Jason, a staff presenter, said the simpler package would provide twice‑yearly scheduled service while a second package would add continuous remote monitoring and on‑site support hours.
"For simplicity's sake, that is meaning that twice a year, they'll send somebody out to make sure it's ready to make the transition from hot to cold or cold to hot," Jason said, describing the baseline agreement and putting a rough annual price on it. He told the commission that the baseline service would cost roughly $21,000 per year and that a two‑year biannual package was quoted at $43,281.
Jason also outlined the BAS (building automation system) option, which would include 24/7 remote access and a bank of 96 on‑site support hours annually: "They would log in ... I can fix it from here or I can't. I'm gonna dispatch a driver," he said. That package is substantially more expensive but, according to staff, could reduce recurring troubleshooting and dispatch delays.
Commissioners stressed negotiation points: the desired warranty and start date, the level of remote access the county will accept, and whether the county should standardize BAS across multiple county facilities to reduce long‑term complexity. The commission directed staff to continue negotiations with Trane, seek a clarified start date and firm costs, and return a recommended contract for formal action at a future meeting.
