Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Peer Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee deletes redundant peer‑review definition and directs technical edits to standards language
Summary
The committee agreed to remove a redundant definition (item 63) related to board-approved peer-review programs and tasked staff and counsel to make technical stylistic edits and update references to current standards offline before the board packet.
Get email alerts on the Peer Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members reviewed Jeremiah’s editorial suggestions and debated whether a definition (item 63) remained necessary given adjacent language. Committee members concluded the phrase was redundant with item 64 (standards for performing and reporting on peer reviews) and agreed to delete item 63 in its entirety and to have counsel and staff finalize technical edits offline.
Committee members also discussed corrections to several standards references and versioning language in the draft rules; they instructed board counsel to update citations to the most current standards where appropriate and to correct apparent copy‑and‑paste errors before the packet is published. "So scratch 63 in its entirety?" a member asked; the committee agreed. Staff will coordinate the precise wording with counsel and reflect those edits in the materials sent to the board for exposure.

