Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter alleges Sunshine Act concern over public defender confirmation
Summary
A public commenter at the Delaware County Personnel Board meeting asked whether the board was confirming the public defender and alleged possible Sunshine Act violations; Executive Director O'Malley said appointments are nominations contingent on jail oversight board confirmation.
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the start of the public-comment period, a resident who identified themselves as Kai Winn raised questions about item 5i and whether the board was “appointing him as chief public defender.” The commenter alleged possible "Sunshine Act" violations and asked whether confirmations were being handled through "backdoor meetings." "So are we appointing him as chief public defender? ... Are we violating the Sunshine Act?" the commenter asked.
Executive Director O'Malley responded during the meeting, clarifying the county's process: "The executive director nominates the warden, which is confirmed by the jail oversight board..." and later noted that confirmations are contingent upon approval by the jail oversight board. A staff member also reminded the audience that the public-comment period is not a question-and-answer forum and that members may not receive direct answers during that time. The transcript shows the board proceeded with the agenda and that the jail oversight board meeting would immediately follow to address confirmations.
