Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ev Charging Ryan Bart topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Neighbors and schools raise safety concerns; Warren commission postpones EV charging hub proposal

City of Warren Planning Commission · July 27, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A proposed 16–28 stall EV supercharger at Ryan Road and Bart drew strong opposition from Fitzgerald Public Schools and nearby residents over student safety, traffic and battery-fire concerns; commissioners asked the petitioner for more data and postponed the matter to Aug. 10.

An application to build a 16–28 stall electric vehicle supercharging lot at the corner of Ryan Road and Bart prompted prolonged public comment and a split commission on July 27, leading members to postpone the item for additional information.

Applicant Ahmed Maki described plans for 16 supercharger stalls, downward lighting, landscaping and Starlink-connected cameras. "Our goal is to bring that green initiative to the City of Warren," he said, while noting the plan could be phased.

Fitzgerald Public Schools and neighbors objected. Bill Rudd, representing Fitzgerald Public Schools, submitted a letter that urged rejection of the site "directly across the street from Fitzgerald High School," citing student safety, increased vehicular turning movements, loitering and operational conflicts with bus and drop‑off patterns. "Placing a high capacity commercial charging hub in the immediate vicinity of a high school creates significant safety, traffic, and operational challenges that outweigh the benefits of this specific location," Rudd wrote and read into the record.

Other residents warned about the difficulty of extinguishing lithium-ion battery fires and about potential vandalism near schools. The applicant said the site was recommended by charger providers as productive and emphasized camera coverage and curbing to reduce risks. Commissioners debated whether the site is appropriate, asked for traffic-study data and fire‑safety documentation and expressed concern about vandalism and student access to the equipment.

The commission lacked a clear majority to deny the plan outright and ultimately voted to postpone the item to the August 10 meeting, asking the petitioner to provide additional information (safety data, traffic study and security/insurance details) before the matter returns.

Next steps: petitioner to supply requested data ahead of the Aug. 10 hearing at City Hall.