Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Border Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brewster County court backs resolution opposing physical border wall, urges tech solutions
Summary
Brewster County commissioners voted March 10 to join local cities and neighboring counties in opposing construction of a physical border wall in the Big Bend area and said they prefer technology-based security measures; the court approved a mirror resolution and discussed coordinating public messaging.
Brewster County Judge led the court March 10 in approving a resolution opposing construction of a physical border wall in the Big Bend area, saying the county will mirror a city resolution and coordinate with neighboring counties. "Putting a wall up does not make sense in that particular part of the Big Bend area," the Judge said, adding that the county will pursue a joint statement with other county judges.
The resolution passed after a motion and second. Supporters on the court emphasized that technological approaches—cameras, IR sensors and ground sensors—are effective in the terrain and that the county wants border security but not a permanent physical barrier. "We've welcomed the governor to come out and see what we've got," the Judge said, describing recent discussions with state officials about alternatives. Commissioners also cautioned that maps and federal plans can change, so continued local advocacy remains necessary.
The court discussed posting the resolution on the county tourism site and coordinating media outreach so the county's stance is clear but not a broader political campaign. The resolution will be circulated to other county judges to create a joint statement and local officials agreed to share a copy with the tourism office for reference.
