Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vision Wording topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioner questions wording in Rockwall County's vision statement; court strikes contested sentence
Summary
A commissioner raised syntax and antecedent concerns about the vision statement's final sentence; presenters defended the wording as aspirational and the court voted to remove the disputed line before approving the plan.
During debate over the proposed vision statement for Rockwall County's Strategic Plan 2050, Commissioner Stacy repeatedly questioned phrasing and the sentence that referenced a collective "we" promising decisions with lasting impact.
"I do not understand the vision statement," Commissioner Stacy said during the discussion, arguing that the phrasing blurred the line between a visionary statement and a promise of action. Presenters and other commissioners responded that the phrasing "higher quality of life" was intended to indicate continuous improvement and that "we" referred broadly to county officials, employees and elected leaders. Lauren, a CSC member, noted that the sentence could remain but was not essential to the vision.
After extended discussion about antecedent clarity and the difference between mission and vision language, the court agreed to strike the final contested sentence from the vision statement prior to the final motion to approve the plan.
