Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court forms committee to pick third‑party reviewers for subdivision plans
Summary
Commissioners voted to form a committee to select two independent engineering firms that would perform paid third‑party reviews of subdivision plans to check drainage and downstream impacts; the approach is structured to charge the developer, not taxpayers, and include thresholds and discretion to avoid burdening very small splits.
The Parker County Commissioners Court agreed to form a committee to identify two independent engineering firms to perform third‑party reviews of subdivision plans, a move intended to strengthen county oversight of drainage, downstream impacts and construction quality without using taxpayer funds.
Commissioner Holt told the court the approach used in several neighboring counties requires the developer to pay the county for an independent review at a neutral firm; the county then pays that reviewer directly. "The intent behind this is it's a way at no cost whatsoever to taxpayers to get formal engineered review of new subdivisions for things like drainage, things like downstream impact," Holt said. He proposed a committee and directed staff to prepare an RFQ/RFP for two rotating firms.
Mister Nave, an engineer who testified during the discussion, said a rotating pair of reviewers helps avoid conflicts when a developer's engineer is also on a county-approved list. County staff and consultant Bronner described current practice as accepting developer-submitted, stamped drainage reports without independent checks and cited recent downstream complaints and a pending TCEQ review on Kelly Road as reasons to add formal reviews. Nave estimated a typical review fee in the $1,500–$2,500 range when comments are limited; he said costs can be lower for simpler submissions.
The court approved a motion (5–0) to create a review committee including Commissioner Holt and identified county and staff participants to screen the existing pool of RFQ-awarded firms and return recommendations for court approval. The committee will recommend thresholds to route only larger or higher-risk plats to paid review so very small one- or two-lot splits are not burdened by the extra cost.
