Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Food Insecurity topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council weighs future of holiday meal drives and food-program options

Wood Village City Council · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff reviewed five years of holiday meal programming (about $40,000 spent total; Wood Village residents about one-third of participants) and proposed options including continuing in-house drives, partnering with East County Food Pantry, a weekly farm stand with Outgrowing Hunger and a double-up bucks token pilot; council asked staff to gather resident input before deciding.

City staff reviewed the city's five-year involvement in holiday meal programs and broader food access efforts, reporting that the city spent "just over $40,000" on holiday and related programs across five years and that Wood Village residents represented about one-third of program participants.

"Overall, over the past 5 years, spent just over $40,000 on this program," the staff presenter told the council while outlining program history and participation breakdowns. Staff described program options going forward: continue registration-based turkey/holiday meal boxes, partner with East County Food Pantry for distribution, pilot a weekly farm stand in partnership with Outgrowing Hunger and pursue the double-up bucks token program to increase fresh-produce access.

Councilors focused on whether the city should prioritize Wood Village residents, how to limit registrations to local households, and how to gather resident preferences. "I do think it's time that we really take a hard look at this," said Councilor Minor, urging focused outreach and resident feedback before making budget decisions. Staff recommended low-cost outreach (newsletter, on-site quick surveys at major events) and a modest budget hold (about $12,000 in recent years was cited) to preserve options while staff develops a recommended approach for the budget cycle.

No final program changes were adopted at the meeting; council directed staff to gather additional resident input and to coordinate with regional partners to present options at a future meeting.