Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Auction Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court discusses appointing commissioner to preside over county property auctions
Summary
The court debated who should preside over auctions of county-owned parcels and whether the presiding commissioner should be allowed to bid; staff advised the presiding officer should not both oversee and bid on properties to avoid perceived conflicts.
Karnes County Commissioners Court discussed appointing a commissioner to preside over public auctions for county-owned properties and debated conflict-of-interest concerns if the presiding officer were also a potential bidder. Staff advised that the officer who presides over a sale should not also bid, and commissioners considered selecting an officer without geographic ties to the parcels to avoid the appearance of favoritism.
"The officer presiding over the sale should not bid on property tax sale," staff said, adding that someone with no connection to the parcels' location would be an ideal candidate to preside. Commissioners agreed it would be permissible for others, including county officials, to bid so long as the presiding officer did not participate in bidding. The court asked staff to prepare an order that appoints a commissioner to manage the auction logistics, publishes required notices, and reads the sale verbiage on the day of the sale.
