Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents raise safety, housing and wildlife concerns during Simi Valley public comment period
Summary
At the council meeting residents urged action on a dangerous Cochrane/Archerwood crossing, asked for data‑center oversight, urged help for veterans, described code‑enforcement blight and reported a coyote infestation threatening pets and children.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Multiple residents used the public‑comment period to press the council on safety and quality‑of‑life issues across Simi Valley.
Richard Douglas asked the city to evaluate safety at Cochrane and Archerwood Lane after a fatal pedestrian collision, saying, "There's no safe way to cross Cochran in Archerwood Lane." City staff replied that a traffic assessment will be done once school is back in session to capture true traffic conditions. Several residents raised long‑running concerns about the Woodlands/Runkel Canyon development and urged the city to limit extensions for outstanding work; a Woodlands homeowner said repeated five‑year extensions have left homeowners frustrated.
Speakers also addressed veterans’ outreach and banners (Frank Tomlinson and Jamie Sanchez urged meaningful veteran supports), urged the city to prepare standards before any data‑center proposals arrive (Deb Dickerson warned of energy, water and noise impacts), and asked the city to support local filming opportunities (Dale Steinick). On wildlife and public safety, Seth Putnam and Travis Foster described a multi‑year coyote problem, with Putnam saying coyotes "have been killing and eating pets" and Foster reporting his street had lost six cats in a year; staff provided a Ventura County animal services phone number and posted educational materials.
Councilmembers acknowledged the concerns, recommended followup (including a local traffic evaluation and further outreach on veteran banners and tiny‑home options), and invited staff to return with next steps where appropriate.

