Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legal Contracting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County legal staff says JE Dunn letter reads like binding offer under Oklahoma law
Summary
Legal staff reviewed Oklahoma cases and statutes and advised the board that JE Dunn's proposal "reads as a firm offer," meaning board approval via agenda/CMF would likely create a binding contract, though some proposal conditions (change orders, subcontractor execution) require clarification.
At the Tulsa County special meeting, a staff attorney reviewed Oklahoma caselaw and statute and advised commissioners that the JE Dunn proposal appears to constitute a firm offer that the board can accept through formal agenda action.
The staff speaker cited a 2020 case (Franco) and a Court of Civil Appeals decision involving Christ Legacy Church and Trinity Group (2018), and referenced Title 15, Section 68. In the meeting the legal speaker summarized: "It reads as a firm offer. They say time is of the essence. We need written approval... any reasonable person saying, please approve this offer would conclude then." The attorney added that creating a CMF item and captioning it as board approval would be a reasonable mode of acceptance, while noting the contractor's front-page language about "must obtain county approval, and executed owner change order, and executed subcontractors" introduces caveats.
Board members discussed whether those caveats meant the contractor had conditioned acceptance on executed change orders. The legal speaker said that if such conditions are complied with by Aug. 3, the board should be "good to go," but also proposed empowering the chair to execute follow-up documents to ensure timely mobilization. Commissioners approved the acceleration motion with that authority.
The staff legal opinion in the meeting frames the county's path forward to accept the proposal promptly while addressing required documentation; the transcript records the legal references but not any formal written opinion beyond the oral analysis at the meeting.
