Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors cite truck traffic, road safety and well-water risks in opposition to mine expansion
Summary
Dozens of Hanover County residents told the Board of Zoning Appeals that heavy dump-truck traffic, narrow rural roads used by school buses, increased dust and potential impacts to private wells argue against approving any expansion of the Purcell mine beyond the area identified by the zoning administrator.
Residents living near Chestnut Church and Georgetown roads delivered sustained public comment opposing expansion of the Purcell borrow pit. Complaints centered on heavy truck traffic that residents say damages narrow roads and creates safety hazards near school-bus routes, increased dust and noise and fears about contamination or depletion of private well water.
Elizabeth Bass, who said her property backs up closest to the proposed expansion, told the board, "I would have never purchased my property had I known that I was backing up to a mine." Drew Patterson reported specific truck counts and told the board one day saw "over 300 dump trucks" on a Saturday. Residents asked the county for environmental impact and roadway studies before greenlighting expansion and raised concerns about late or incomplete notice of the application.
Occupational and local-safety perspectives were raised as well: a retired firefighter asked who would regulate vacuum trucks and other materials being brought onto the site, and a professional engineer described seeing vacuum-excavation trucks and expressed concern about uninspected spoil disposal. Several speakers urged denial of the appeal and for the county to enforce existing ordinances.
Charles Purcell, the operator, addressed the board and said he fields calls and listed his phone number at the site for neighbors to report problems. He said the operation services county projects and that his company follows state bonding and permitting processes but that he was surprised by a recent county determination limiting activity to 53.25 acres.
The board closed public comment after the testimony and proceeded to questions, rebuttals and the vote on the appeal.
