Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Government Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Retired lieutenant tells board to disclose who authored county investigation and licensing

Monroe County Board of Commissioners · April 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Michael Davidson urged Monroe County commissioners to produce documentation showing who conducted a recent county-funded investigation, whether investigators were licensed in Michigan, and how $130,000 in costs were authorized; he warned the report contains unverified allegations that could expose the county to legal risk.

During the first public comment period Michael Davidson (S13), a retired lieutenant from the Monroe County sheriff’s office and president of Davidson Investigation Court, asked the board for documentation showing who conducted and authorized a recent county-funded investigation.

Davidson said his review identified that the county retained outside counsel who then hired "Mark Portello and Portello Associations based in California." He raised concerns that the firm and lead investigator do not appear to hold Michigan investigator licenses, which he said Michigan law requires for investigative activity performed in the state. "Was an investigation conducted in Michigan? If so, under what license or what authority did he conduct his investigation?" Davidson asked. He said the public deserves a notarized license number or documentation of a relationship with a licensed Michigan investigative agency.

Davidson also criticized the report for including allegations he described as unverified — including references to a so-called "group of four" senior officials — and questioned whether the board considered defamation liability before accepting and distributing the report. He said the investigation has already cost county taxpayers roughly $130,000 and asked whether there is a spending cap and whether legal retainers have been exceeded.

The board did not provide immediate documentation in the meeting record. Commissioners acknowledged the remarks; chair and other members confirmed the matter was under the purview of legal counsel and noted other legal processes ongoing.