Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pickleball courts at Arapahoe Station draw mixed reaction from county commissioners
Summary
A Greenwood Village proposal to convert a parking lot by Arapahoe Station into four pickleball courts ($1.85M total; $600,000 requested from Arapahoe County) drew concerns about cost per court, lack of immediate playground/amenities, noise mitigation and whether the site is a missed transit-oriented housing opportunity; Greenwood Village representatives said outreach showed demand and that the location buffers sound.
Commissioners debated a Greenwood Village request for up to $600,000 toward converting a large parking lot at Arapahoe Station into a four-court pickleball facility. County staff said the city sought the county's standard grant support for recreation amenities; Greenwood Village representatives said public outreach showed strong demand for pickleball.
"I just don't love it," Commissioner Jessica Campbell said, noting the county share would be $600,000 for only four courts and questioning whether the site presents a long-term community benefit beyond the courts. "I don't think it's gonna rise to the level enough for me to be like, no," she added, but signaled reservations about prioritization.
Greenwood Village staff and open-spaces personnel said the site currently is bounded by a parking structure and uses that buffer to reduce noise impacts on nearby homes. "They are trying to respond to this community desire for more pickleball courts because there is such a lack of them in Greenwood Village," a county open-space representative said, noting the design intentionally places courts away from residential noise-sensitive areas.
Commissioners also raised whether the location, adjacent to light rail, could be better used for transit-oriented development or future housing; Greenwood Village representatives said the city is largely built out and that the site was chosen because it meets buffering and access needs. The board did not remove the project from the recommended funding package but recorded substantive concerns and questions about phasing, community engagement and long-term plans for expansion or complementary amenities.
