Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Registry Privacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs registry privacy, public access and enforcement uses
Summary
Staff said the county attorney recommended a registry; commissioners debated whether the registry should be public or internal, how much data it may legally contain, and whether a registration number should be required on public listings to aid enforcement.
Staff told commissioners the county attorney had recommended creating a registry for short‑term rentals, but commissioners raised privacy and FOIA concerns about making that registry public. The Planning Director cautioned that the "state authorizing language for a registry can only seek those 3 items," and commissioners asked whether the county can require additional information or publish registration details on listing platforms.
Debate focused on enforcement practicality versus privacy: some commissioners argued public registry numbers (required on Airbnb/VRBO listings) would help neighbors and enforcement spot unlicensed rentals; others said registry data could be a privacy invasion and stressed the need to consult the county attorney on what can be lawfully disclosed. Staff said the county already uses revenue‑office listings as a de facto registry and suggested ways to compare data if a formal registry is adopted.
