Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Building director reports on long projects and code practice; cites 2 Bigelow inspection reinstatement

Mill Valley Planning Commission · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The building director told the commission staff is reviewing how state permit rules and local municipal construction‑time limits interact after a resident complaint about a long project; staff said a permit at 2 Bigelow lapsed and was reinstated after inspection and fees and that the project received final inspection on March 5.

At the end of the March 10 meeting the building director briefed the Planning Commission on complaints about prolonged construction and how the city enforces construction‑time limits.

The director noted municipal code provisions set maximum construction durations based on valuation and provide for compliance orders and escalating penalties when projects exceed limits. He explained that state building code rules also affect permit activity — for example, permits may be reinstated with inspections and fees and the building official may grant extensions in certain cases. The director said staff is reviewing the city’s approach to ensure it balances neighborhood protection with the state rules and practical factors that have slowed projects in recent years, including pandemic‑era delays and contractor turnover.

As a case example the director said the project at 2 Bigelow had a permit lapse and was subsequently reinstated after inspection and payment of reinstatement fees; he added that the 2 Bigelow project received a final inspection on March 5. He told commissioners staff will continue to monitor construction timelines and may bring proposed code alignment recommendations forward for council consideration.

Commissioners asked clarifying questions about whether local time limits had been observed in the cited cases and whether penalties or extensions had been applied; staff said they are coordinating with the building official and city attorney and will report back on any proposed code changes.