Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Annexation Kanesville topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Applicant seeks annexation for construction office on Kanesville Road; staff says request conflicts with current residential future land use

Lebanon Planning Commission · July 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Adam Garner asked to annex and rezone about 2.11 acres on Kanesville Road to suburban commercial for an office; staff scored the request 46/100 and noted required sewer main extension and compatibility concerns. Applicant said he will pursue an SP option and add a landscaping buffer.

Planning staff introduced a request by Adam (Garner) to annex approximately 2.11 acres at 1835 Kanesville Road and rezone the parcel to Suburban Commercial (CS), accompanied by a future land use plan amendment from residential (2 units/acre) to suburban commercial; staff said the request scored 46/100 and is not compatible with surrounding uses (SEG 684-712).

Adam Garner (speaker 10) said the site is currently used as an office for his construction business (he described existing trailers parked behind the building) and that he intends to pursue either CS or an SP to better fit the future land‑use designation. "I really am trying to do this properly... I want to be a contributing member of the society here and wanna see Lebanon grow," Garner said. He told staff he will submit a landscaping buffer plan to transition from industrial to residential and that he will request a utility availability letter for sewer connection from the Wilson Water Authority District.

Commissioners asked for pictures of the existing building and for the applicant to return with landscaping and SP language if he pursues the SP option; staff said pursuing an SP would require the applicant to return to the commission, whereas moving forward under CS could proceed if staff concerns are addressed. No final annexation vote or rezoning decision was recorded at the meeting.