Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews rewritten animal control ordinance: new dangerous-animal levels, tethering language and breed-based spay/neuter requirement
Summary
County staff presented comprehensive amendments to the animal control ordinance, adding levels for dangerous animals with an appeal process, expanding tethering rules from 'dog' to 'animal', tying livestock husbandry to state law (47-4-160), and retaining a breed-based spay/neuter requirement for pit bulls; council forwarded the amendments to county council.
County staff walked through extensive proposed changes to the animal control ordinance, emphasizing several substantive shifts intended to modernize enforcement and align with state law. Staff explained the rewritten dangerous-animal section creates levels 1–3 with a separate appeal process and clarified that the appeal is handled by the court that adjudicated the initial incident rather than animal-services officers. Staff said the nuisance/tethering language was broadened to "animal" rather than "dog," and recommended pulley/trolley systems as a best-practice alternative to fixed tethering.
On livestock, staff noted the ordinance now references state law (cited in the meeting as "47-4-160") and states that county provisions do not supersede the state's animal-husbandry rules. Staff also described a breed-based restriction that requires pit bulls to be spayed or neutered, explaining this is a local measure tied to shelter capacity and not a ban. Council members asked about coordination with municipalities, complaints about roosters, and whether wildfire should be included in weather-related provisions. After discussion, councilors indicated no objection to forwarding the ordinance amendments to county council for further consideration.
