Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Project Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Finalists outline three-week scheduling, Procore use and safety plans for Colman‑Egan athletic complex
Summary
Contractor teams described project controls including Procore document management, three-week look‑ahead schedules, weekly safety meetings, pre-installation meetings and third‑party safety audits as part of their proposals to the Colman‑Egan board.
Get email alerts on the Project Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Contractor finalists told the Colman‑Egan board they would rely on regular, short‑interval scheduling and digital tools to keep the athletic complex on track. Multiple presenters described three‑week look‑ahead schedules and the use of Procore for document control so all parties view the same drawings, schedules and submittals.
Josh Popkis of Pitts described the three‑week schedule process: "He'll do 3 week schedules. It breaks it down week by week. We send them out every Friday." Chase Temple, a presenter identified as a superintendent, said safety is among the top priorities: "One of our top priorities is to have the safety of the students and the staff as well as our construction crew." Firms also described pre‑construction meetings, pre‑install meetings for subcontractors, weekly safety meetings and periodic third‑party safety audits to reduce trade stacking and ensure safe site logistics.
Board members asked about key milestones and long‑lead items; presenters responded that cost opinions at schematic and design‑development stages would guide scope decisions and that long‑lead procurement (e.g., scoreboard, specialty equipment) would be ordered early to prevent schedule slips. The transcript records these process commitments but does not list final milestone dates or a firm opening date.

