Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Technology Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hermosa Beach board weighs phone-free rules after students and parents urge tougher enforcement

Hermosa Beach City School District Board of Education · September 12, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees discussed options for implementing a phone-free policy — from a full ban to locked pouches — after public commenters and a student urged stricter enforcement. Staff said a state Phone Free School Act (AB 3,216) will require district policies by July 1, 2026.

Trustees at the Hermosa Beach City School District meeting on Sept. 11 heard sustained public pressure to tighten enforcement of the district’s cellphone policy and debated four implementation models staff outlined.

Parent Beth Albrecht told the board spot checks aren’t enough and urged stronger measures: “Any rule is only real when it's enforced,” she said, and suggested lockable pouches used in nearby districts. Student Cordelia Ferriola Davis told trustees phones were a problem before school and in bathrooms and stated plainly, “Phones should not be allowed in school.”

Superintendent Dr. Wildes framed the discussion around pending state action, saying the topic is now rooted in “Assembly Bill 3,216, which is otherwise known as the Phone Free School Act,” and that districts must develop policies limiting smartphone use by July 1, 2026. Wildes described four models for local implementation: a campus-wide ban; a “silenced and away” approach (devices powered down and stored during school hours); classroom ‘phone hotels’; and locked pouches (vendors such as Yonder).

Board members raised enforcement, equity and cost concerns. Staff noted locked pouches can carry a 20–30% damage/replenishment rate and require extra staffing and charging infrastructure; a 1:1 pouch program was estimated at a roughly $20–$30 per-student all-in cost in initial modeling. Trustees asked staff to run stakeholder surveys, include students, parents and staff, and pilot lower-cost options (the superintendent suggested starting with a silenced-and-away enforcement model while surveys run).

The board directed staff to draft a stakeholder survey and return recommendations; no formal policy was adopted at the meeting.