Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alternatives topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge nature‑based treatment and stricter containment rather than single‑line tanks in floodplain
Summary
A local resident urged ADEM to require nature‑based treatment (biofiltration/constructed wetlands) or at least double/triple containment for tanks proposed in a flood zone, arguing these options better protect groundwater and the Flint River.
Alicia Booth Hangermaker, who said she lives on the Flint River, told the hearing she is not opposed to growth but urged ADEM and project designers to pursue less‑risky, nature‑based options.
"There are better options that meet the same need without gambling with our water," Hangermaker said, recommending biofiltration and constructed‑wetland systems that filter wastewater through soil and native plants before it reaches the river. She asked ADEM to require higher design standards, double or triple containment for tanks if they are used, and public engagement in the design process so the project can serve growth while protecting the Flint River.
Other commenters likewise asked regulators to evaluate alternatives and to require contingency plans, arguing that nature‑based approaches are proven and scalable and would reduce long‑term costs and ecological risk.
