Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates noise mitigation and hours for outdoor recreation
Summary
Commissioners and the applicant debated how prescriptive the commission should be about noise mitigation and hours for outdoor recreation at the proposed Russwood pickleball courts; the applicant cited plan-of-operation measures and approximate decibel estimates.
The Planning and Zoning Commission spent substantial time debating how to balance neighborhood quiet with business operations when considering outdoor recreation at the Russwood Drive site. Staff recommended limiting hours and requiring mitigation; the applicant asked the commission to instead rely on the plan of operation's specific mitigation measures and to allow a 10 p.m. closing time for the facility.
During public testimony and questions, the applicant's agent, Tal Fillingham, described the mitigation as wind-barrier coverings mounted on fences that are "manufactured for that very specific purpose." Tal said the repeating sound of the pickleball paddle is low in decibel level and estimated "about at the same as my conversation with you right now around 50 to 60 decibels." Commissioners voiced concern about precedent and cost to property owners if the city prescribes particular materials; one commissioner said staff's suggested mitigation might be "a little bit arbitrary" and noted the plan of operation already addresses noise. The commission ultimately approved the CUP relying on the concept plan and the plan of operation rather than an explicit prescriptive mitigation standard.
