Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cost Recovery topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears citywide cost-recovery options to reduce general-fund subsidy
Summary
Staff presented a citywide review identifying services whose fees lag costs and recommended dozens of potential fee adjustments and program realignments—animal shelter, environmental health, abatement, libraries, golf, landfill and utilities—many to be studied and returned as resolutions during the budget process.
City Manager Grayson presented a broad cost-recovery review focused on general-fund departments to reduce reliance on property-tax revenue. Staff told council the exercise sought modest, defensible changes—fee realignments, phased increases and revenue realignment—rather than immediate, across-the-board cuts.
Examples included shifting grease-trap revenue from utilities to the Environmental Health general fund, phased increases to abatement administrative fees, increasing certain library charges and printing fees, restoring animal-adoption fees to ordinance levels, and continuing incremental fee increases at golf to reach cost recovery. Grayson said some proposals are legally constrained (vital statistics fees set by the state) and others may require board input and public outreach before implementation.
Council supported the overall approach but repeatedly requested specific dollar impacts. Grayson committed to including detailed revenue estimates for proposed fee changes in the official budget package and to bringing back resolutions authorizing staff to pursue specified fee adjustments with required outreach and ordinance changes.
